No, his party is not calling for an exit from the EU, affirmed the well-known party positions.

No, his party is not calling for an exit from the EU, affirmed the well-known party positions.

No, his party is not calling for an exit from the EU, affirmed the well-known party positions.

Further billions will flow into the expansion of the charging station infrastructure for e-cars and battery cell production. Also included is the already agreed capital increase for Deutsche Bahn of five billion euros. The conversion to modern aircraft is also to be funded with one billion euros. Seven billion euros are estimated for a “national hydrogen strategy”. The expansion of solar and wind power is being pushed.

The CO2 building renovation program is topped up by one billion euros. Source:, bad / vpe / dpa / rts “About as dynamic as the entire European election campaign: the” “Summit” “(Photo: dpa) As passionless as the election campaign is also the “” summit “” for the European elections. At least the government crisis brings a little fire into the group – and above all puts a party leader under pressure. To get the chairmen of all major German parties to a TV studio for 90 minutes in advance Having a debate about an important election sounds promising. It was of little use: The ARD’s “” Summit “” was like the entire European election campaign: abstract, dispassionate, distant – somehow dust-dry. None of the party leaders really got over the well-known political platitudes , Nobody could really set the tone, so it has to be described as a dramatic stroke of luck that a serious government crisis is unfolding in Austria.

Because that way there was at least a bit of a hot topic to talk about, although the topic was set at the beginning of the program and expectations, especially of a guest, were high. What would AfD party leader Jörg Meuthen say about the events in Austria? As a reminder: yesterday evening he spoke of a “” singular event “” at “” Anne Will “”. Almost 24 hours later, however, not only Vice Chancellor Heinz-Christian Strache, but also the entire FPÖ government team announced their resignation.

Meuthen’s party looked up to its powerful sister party in the past. Faction leader Alexander Gauland once said with admiration: “” Everything they do is of course exemplary for us. “” In the meantime, the “exemplary” party is in ruins. And so Meuthen admits that the Strache affair Video for Austria “” could have “” significant effects “”. But it is above all an “” inner Austrian event “”.

The first part of the assessment is quite realistic. According to the first Sunday question after the video was published, 18 percent would currently vote for the FPÖ – the worst value in six years. Then, however, he falls into the AfD-typical argumentation pattern. He swaps cause and effect, says that the scandal was triggered by the video (not by Strache, for example) and tries to divert attention from the topic: Misbehavior like the current one has existed among the “” old Austrian parties “” for biology essay writing service uk The moderation did not ask any questions, but the other party leaders can, of course, strike against their political opponents.

CDU leader Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer says the incident proves “what is in the right-wing populists”. Greens chairman Annalena Baerbock claims that parties like the FPÖ aim to “” destroy democracy. CSU leader Markus Söder believes that after the incident “no cooperation with right-wing populists is possible anywhere in Europe” “. The SPD chairwoman Andrea Nahles hopes for a lesson in the European elections for the “” conservative parties that “” helped them to power “”.

Left leader Riexinger is certain that right-wing parties will lose out in the election and FDP chairman Christian Lindner sees the “second shambles” that right-wing populists would leave in Europe after Brexit. So far, so predictable. But this evening is supposed to be about something else: European issues. To do this, the moderators are switching to Prague – a country where EU skepticism is high.

Then Meuthen spoke again, confronted with the fact that the AfD also had Germany’s exit from the EU in its electoral program as an “” Ultima Ratio “”. But wouldn’t that ultimately damage Germany? It would even be “” immense “”, admits Meuthen. But the “” Dexit “” is only formulated as a “” manifest threat “” in the event that the other parties who “” don’t care about the rule of law “” continue as before. Then the moderator hooks up and cuts Meuthen off: “” You haven’t answered the question, “” she says.

He actually already had that. Then the SPD and the left are allowed to comment on the Dexit issue. Nahles calls for anti-European parties to have their funds cut if necessary. Riexinger is asked how the left feels about Dexit. No, his party is not calling for an exit from the EU, affirmed the well-known party positions. Why the other representatives do not have a say – unclear. Next topic: European social policy.

The party leaders have a brief opportunity to represent their positions. The viewer is then taken on a trip to Spain, where a reporter in a workshop explains how the minimum wage in Spain has recently increased by 22 percent. Whether he can report “” a little more “” is given to the man on site. These are well-known facts from the southern European country: unemployment is high – even for the highly qualified. Then the top German politicians should comment on the situation in Spain.

This reveals an old problem in European election campaigns: German party representatives describe how they want to cope with the challenges of another European state via Brussels and Strasbourg. Everything seems far away. When it comes to climate protection, CDU boss Kramp-Karrenbauer is asked to talk “” Tacheles “”. After all, she rejected a CO2 tax and then received an objection from her party.

A tax is needed, yes, but not an “” isolated tax “”, she is thinking of an “” overall package “”, answers AKK with a clear yes and no. No, not a Tacheles today. Green boss Baerbock speaks of the exit from the internal combustion engine and the moderator insinuates “” the gentlemen “” to “” shrug “” because it is about “” bans “”.

Nobody flinches, nor has Baerbock spoken of prohibitions. But the transition to the other end of the spectrum has been made. The attempt to lure Meuthen onto the ice on climate policy ends predictably: the AfD boss questions whether climate change is man-made.

The moderator reacts with a short, protesting laugh. The last topic is also broadcast live to another European country. In the dark of night, a reporter stands in front of the Moria refugee camp on the Greek island of Lesbos and moderates a pre-prepared report that begins with the words “” The Moria refugee camp by day “”. Then the party leaders set out their known positions again – from a “” Fortress Europe “” (Meuthen) to maximum openness of borders (Riexinger). At least briefly, arguing passion flares up on this topic, and not between Meuthen and everyone else, but between Baerbock and AKK.

Namely, when the CDU leader called on the Greens to finally give up the blockade in the Federal Council on the classification of the North African states and Baerbock defended that repatriations had nothing to do with safe states. Anyone who actually persevered until then was served with abstract final statements. What is the value of Europe for the party leaders? The answers are in the tradition of the broadcast. Söder replies: “” Europe is our home “”. For AKK, Europe is a “” matter of course that I use every day.

And Baerbock simply repeats the slogan from the election poster: “” Europe is the best that Europe has ever created. “” Source: “Chancellor Angela Merkel’s popularity ratings can be skipped in the event of a candidacy for CSU boss Markus Söder. Good (Photo: imago images / Christian Spicker) If the federal election were on Sunday, more people would vote for the CDU and CSU than for the SPD, Greens and Left together. According to Forsa, the FDP is only just above the five percent mark. Kalbitz ‘ Sacking the AfD divides the AfD, but most of its voters agree with Meuthen. The political mood in Germany is largely unchanged after the first major easing of the corona measures.

The Union remains by far the strongest political force in the Corona crisis. Compared to the previous week, the CDU / CSU in the RTL / ntv trend barometer can improve by one percentage point and are back at 40 percent. This makes the Union stronger than the entire “” left “” voter camp of the Greens, the SPD and the Left, who together make up 39 percent. The FDP loses one percentage point and is now at 5 percent. If the federal elections were on this Sunday, the SPD, FDP and AfD would receive fewer votes, and the Greens and Union more votes than in the 2017 federal election: CDU / CSU 40 percent (2017: 32.9 percent ), SPD 15 percent (2017: 20.5 percent), FDP 5 percent (2017: 10.7 percent), Greens 16 percent (2017: 8.9 percent), Left 8 percent (2017: 9.2 percent), AfD 9 percent (2017: 12.6 percent). 7 percent would choose one of the other parties (5.2 percent).

The number of non-voters and undecided is currently 26 percent (23.8 percent). The Union’s growth in the Corona crisis is mainly fed by former voters of the SPD, the FDP and the Greens. Of 100 new CDU / CSU voters, 23 voted in September 2017 for the SPD, 22 for the FDP, 12 for the Greens and 3 for the AfD. Contrary to popular belief, the Union hardly benefits from the AfD’s losses, because most of the AfD voters who emigrated at the time would not vote at all at the moment. Of the union growth of 7.1 percentage points, only 0.2 percentage points go to the account of the AfD. In the dispute over the exclusion of the AfD board member Andreas Kalbitz, the supporters of the “” Alternative for Germany “” are torn. On behalf of Mediengruppe RTL Deutschland, Forsa asked AfD supporters in East and West Germany for their assessment this week.

51 percent think the Kalbitz expulsion is correct, 49 percent do not support the decision. 40 percent of those surveyed consider the expulsion to be wrong, 9 percent are undecided. 49 percent of East German supporters are against the exclusion, 42 percent are in favor.

In the West, only 35 percent oppose the exclusion, while 56 percent welcome the move. Another figure shows that the Höcke camp among all AfD supporters is possibly rather small: 80 percent of Höcke supporters reject Kalbitz’s expulsion. Overall, co-party leader Jörg Meuthen currently has the most supporters behind him. 62 percent of the AfD voter camp are of the opinion that Meuthen most likely “” stands for the values ​​and goals of the AfD. Only 22 percent of Kalbitz ally Björn Höcke think so. Accordingly, 57 percent of AfD supporters are convinced that Jörg Meuthen will win the power struggle in the end.

The “” wing “” around Björn Höcke, 24 percent of AfD supporters believe they will win. In the opinion of most AfD supporters – 65 percent – the power struggle should be resolved at a special party conference. Source:, shu “Shortly before the start of the People’s Congress, security measures are omnipresent in Beijing’s center. (Photo: AP) The National People’s Congress begins in Beijing on Friday.

The corona pandemic has cost the Chinese government a lot of sympathy. Those who now hope for self-mortification by the regime will, however, wait in vain. The country has had to overcome a trauma. The National People’s Congress in the People’s Republic of China does not offer a stage for a political exchange of blows this year either. Dictatorships like the Chinese use their parliaments to project a semblance of pluralism into the world. There are also a few colorful pictures of ethnic minorities in their traditional costumes.

China unites fatherland, but the truth is that the People’s Congress only forms the backdrop for statements by the Communist Party’s Politburo in an increasingly totalitarian state. The top committee sets goals and formulates ambitions. That is precisely why it would be foolish not to listen carefully to the rising economic power. Precisely because it sends concrete messages to the world as it imagines the future.

The People’s Congress 2020, which begins on Friday and will be heralded on Thursday with the meeting of the powerful advisory committee, is under a very special star called Corona. If Parliament had met in March as planned, the circumstances would have been completely different from today. In just two months, the Chinese government has gambled away its brilliant starting position in geopolitical power poker. Instead of assuming the role of reliable partner in global crises, the autocrats have lost confidence and sympathy wherever it was still believed that integration into the global community would induce China to make political concessions. The attempts of the autocrats to make theirs to the rest of the world Forcing version of the story were so clumsy and transparent that the displeasure towards the Chinese had an openly negative feedback, even from Europe, which was so little critical of China.

In addition, Beijing’s audacity to wrest the Europeans to give their corona aid to the Chinese without much publicity, but in return to celebrate every protective mask from China towards Europe like the Holy Grail. Beijing has done a lot wrong in this crisis. For this reason, officials like the Chinese diplomat who negotiated membership in the World Trade Organization are warning the government of growing hostility in the world. Anyone who thinks that President Xi Jinping’s team will therefore make less ambitious claims is wrong. Beijing is not interested in concessions.

The party’s century of humiliation is still deep in the bones. All the invasions and occupations by foreign powers between 1842 and 1945 have profoundly shaped their worldview to this day. The Chinese self-image of being a central part of any world order as the Middle Kingdom has been so severely damaged during this century that for today’s political leaders it is primarily a matter of restoring national honor. The means the Chinese government will use remains speculation for the time being.

But there is much evidence to suggest that Beijing is ready to make great sacrifices for this. The autocrats emphasize again and again that they want to peacefully advance their planned ascent to superpower. But that’s only true as long as the rest of the world takes China’s behavior more or less tacitly.